Compare notetakers

Notta vs Otter

Notta and Otter compared on what their own pages say, row by row — nothing about either in our words except a plain reading at the end.

Read on 10 November 2026From each company's own pages

Notta and Otter, row by row

NottaOtter
Free plan: how much“120 transcription minutes/month” — Free source“300 monthly transcription minutes” — Basic, the free plan source
Free plan: longest meeting“Up to 3 minutes per conversation” — Free source“Max transcription time per conversation 30 minutes” — Basic, the free plan source
Free plan: how much is keptNot stated on the pages we read“Conversation history 25 most recent” — Basic, the free plan source
Cheapest paid plan“$8.17 per month, billed annually” — Pro source“$8.33 user/month” — Pro, billed yearly source
How it gets into a meetingNot stated on the pages we read“Joins Zoom, MS Teams, and Google Meet to automatically write and share notes” source
Meeting apps“Record and transcribe Zoom, MS Teams, Google Meet and Webex meetings” source“Zoom, MS Teams, and Google Meet” source
Who said what“Speaker identification” source“Speaker identification (by name)” source
LanguagesNot stated on the pages we read“AI transcription in English, Spanish, French, German, Japanese, and Chinese” source
Video recording“Record web meeting video” — Business source“Video replay for Zoom and Google Meet” — Enterprise source
Downloads and export“Export transcripts” — Pro and up source“Exportable audio, text, and captions mp3, txt” — free plan; pdf, docx and srt are on paid plans source
Single sign-on“SAML SSO” — Enterprise source“Single Sign-On (SSO) minimum 100-user license required” source
APINot stated on the pages we read“Otter API & Webhooks” — Enterprise source

Every cell is the company's own words, linked. Prices change — this is what each page said on 10 November 2026. Something changed? Tell us.

What the two pages add up to

Which matters for your meetings

Notta's free plan is the tighter of the two: three minutes a conversation is enough to try it, not to use it. On paid plans the prices are close and the differences are elsewhere — Notta's list of meeting apps includes Webex, and its single sign-on sits on Enterprise.

What that comes to, worked out

Try a single twenty-minute call on each free plan. Notta writes down its first three minutes; Otter writes down all twenty, since its limit is 30 a conversation. Over a month of such calls Otter's 300 minutes cover fifteen of them in full, while Notta's 120 minutes would be spread over forty three-minute pieces, which is forty openings and no endings. Paid, the two are almost the same price, $8.17 and $8.33 a month billed yearly, $1.92 apart over a whole year.

The sums use only the numbers quoted above. Yearly prices are the monthly figure times twelve.

Where Meetful is different from both

Meetful is a meeting app rather than a notetaker you add to someone else's call. It transcribes each person from their own microphone, so every line carries the name of whoever said it without guessing, and there is no bot in the participant list. The notes, the recording and the transcript are free, and anybody in the meeting can leave themselves out of the notes.

Other comparisons

Try Meetful

Meetings that take their own notes

Free video meetings in the browser: every line of the transcript under the name of who said it, and the summary and action items when you hang up. Nothing to install — guests just open the link.